BBO Discussion Forums: Nat NT overcalls in the trap - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nat NT overcalls in the trap

#1 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2010-July-30, 12:29

After 1x p 1y what NT range is it popular to play these days? I'm not interested in playing some 2 suited take-out. I only ask because I've always considered it standard to play it pretty strong, around 17-19, but I observed a good player overcalling it on a terrible 15 count - I wouldn't even have overcalled 1NT directly on the hand in question.

With the modern penchant for filthy openings and even filthier responses, I understand the desire to get in the auction in situations which in the past would have been considered too dangerous.
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-July-30, 13:12

I think it's still 15-18, with a few more of the 15s excluded than in second seat.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2010-July-30, 16:02

I agree with gnasher.

I have been wondering lately if 15-18 really is the right interval for a NT-overcall in direct position. Perhaps it is too conservative. Perhaps one should lower it by appr. 1 point.
Thin openings (and thin responses) might be shifting the correct weighting between safety and aggression. We are more likely than in the old days to get stolen from, and we are harder to double in 1NT because opener might be thin in responder's view. Getting sensible in to the auction tends to carry such dividends, even with the more balanced hands. Just a thought.
Michael Askgaard
0

#4 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2010-July-30, 16:02

Agree with gnasher, just make your normal overcall. If you're the nervous type it can be a bit stronger, but I wouldn't increase the range by more than 1 HCP.
0

#5 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-July-30, 18:28

Are you intending 1NT overcall to bind other bids not to be bal 15-17?
Then get on your NT response scheme --save memory with same responses.

Or to show stops and little interest in the unbid major?
This clarifies T/O dbl --that's worthwhile.

Either choice begs 'what is left for reopening'?
Another critical partition: immediate act vs delayed act. Which hands which way.
0

#6 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-July-30, 19:48

I would say, "Look at the hand". There are 15-17 point hands that are rubbish, and then there are hands with a source of tricks. I would overcall on the latter; then even if you do get hit, it won't be too bad.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#7 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-July-30, 20:11

15-18 for me. I know you said you are not interested in it, but if you are not willing to overcall with the 15-16 balanced it seems to me you would get more value out of the bid by playing it as a 2 suiter instead.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#8 User is offline   MarkDean 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 595
  • Joined: 2008-April-30
  • Location:Pleasanton, CA, US

Posted 2010-July-30, 22:09

MFA, on Jul 30 2010, 03:02 PM, said:

I agree with gnasher.

I have been wondering lately if 15-18 really is the right interval for a NT-overcall in direct position. Perhaps it is too conservative. Perhaps one should lower it by appr. 1 point.
Thin openings (and thin responses) might be shifting the correct weighting between safety and aggression. We are more likely than in the old days to get stolen from, and we are harder to double in 1NT because opener might be thin in responder's view. Getting sensible in to the auction tends to carry such dividends, even with the more balanced hands. Just a thought.

Back in my young and crazy days, I played 13-16 1NT overcalls NV for a while. It actually worked reasonably well when it came up, but the problem was that you then had to double with 17 balanced.
0

#9 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-July-31, 01:14

I play it as 16-19.
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-July-31, 03:53

MFA, on Jul 30 2010, 10:02 PM, said:

I agree with gnasher.

I have been wondering lately if 15-18 really is the right interval for a NT-overcall in direct position. Perhaps it is too conservative. Perhaps one should lower it by appr. 1 point.
Thin openings (and thin responses) might be shifting the correct weighting between safety and aggression. We are more likely than in the old days to get stolen from, and we are harder to double in 1NT because opener might be thin in responder's view. Getting sensible in to the auction tends to carry such dividends, even with the more balanced hands. Just a thought.

I like this idea, and I believe it will be an advantage for the 14-16 hands that overcall 1NT in second, however the 17-18 hands and 19-20 hands are losing big then having to be big more agressively.

About the sandwich overcall I have started to play it strong for about a year, but hasn't come up yet even once :).
0

#11 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2010-July-31, 18:20

16-19, not afraid to pass with many 16. Ive had my share of juicy penalty over 1NT overcall that im convinced that people overcall too lightly here.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#12 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2010-July-31, 21:23

haha, I played 17-20 for a while, weak-tight right?

16-19 seems about right for my slightly less conservative self these days.
0

#13 User is offline   scrote 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 2009-September-29

Posted 2010-August-01, 18:11

I think you should do it with 15 because the times when you have gameish values the hand plays better when the high cards are more balanced between you and dummy.
You go for a number when you don't have a decent runout suit (which is reasonably unlikely bearing in mind they've bid their suits) not because you're a jack light.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users