I've being looking at appeal cases for a long time.
I have not noticed a case about people asking about carding methods.
As a player I don't recall anyone telling me about such a case from either side - director decision or appeal.
This has always seemed slightly odd to me, but that is my impression. If this represents a new battlefield opening, I await with interest.
Possibly inappropriate questions
#22
Posted 2010-April-26, 14:50
rogerclee, on Apr 24 2010, 04:48 PM, said:
You could want to know a lot of things. However Law 73F says that if you had no demonstrable bridge reason to ask a question, do not be surprised if your board gets adjusted (usually at the NABC+ level I think) because:
It is a perfectly normal directing decision at any level: why NABC+?
Pict, on Apr 24 2010, 10:15 PM, said:
As a player I don't recall anyone telling me about such a case from either side - director decision or appeal.
This has always seemed slightly odd to me, but that is my impression. If this represents a new battlefield opening, I await with interest.
This has always seemed slightly odd to me, but that is my impression. If this represents a new battlefield opening, I await with interest.
No, I do not think they are common, But remember a discussion after such a question in the Spring Foursomes sometime around 1970.
David Stevenson
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
#23
Posted 2010-April-26, 18:49
MarkDean, on Apr 24 2010, 05:40 AM, said:
jjbr for the win
What does this mean?
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
#24
Posted 2010-April-26, 23:29
jjbrr, on Apr 23 2010, 02:00 PM, said:
The title of this thread had a lot of potential.
"How many partners have you had?" is my contribution.
"How many partners have you had?" is my contribution.
Some places you can win a prize for having the most partners.
Regards, Jo Anne
Practice Goodwill and Active Ethics
Director "Please"!
Practice Goodwill and Active Ethics
Director "Please"!
#25
Posted 2010-April-27, 03:13
Vampyr, on Apr 27 2010, 12:49 AM, said:
MarkDean, on Apr 24 2010, 05:40 AM, said:
jjbr for the win
What does this mean?
http://www.urbandict...ne.php?term=ftw
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#26
Posted 2010-April-27, 12:12
Declarer can ask anything anytime and "What's your style?" (in whatever carding or bidding situation) works for me. So does "none" as a response.
If the question is something like "Does that show or deny the Queen?" when they are looking at it, the laws account for it. I believe boiling in oil is the recommended penalty.
Defenders must be careful not to ask something or in a manner that transmits UI.
Dummy should never ask anything except, "I'm going to the bar, would anyone like anything?"
If the question is something like "Does that show or deny the Queen?" when they are looking at it, the laws account for it. I believe boiling in oil is the recommended penalty.
Defenders must be careful not to ask something or in a manner that transmits UI.
Dummy should never ask anything except, "I'm going to the bar, would anyone like anything?"
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?

Help
