Is this ACBL GCC legal?
See: ACBL Convention Charts
2NT asking for aces, undefined hand type.
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
If 2NT is not legal, is 4NT opening asking for aces legal, and why the difference?
Page 1 of 1
2NT asking for aces is this ACBL GCC legal
#2
Posted 2009-November-28, 19:57
glen, on Nov 28 2009, 08:41 PM, said:
Is this ACBL GCC legal?
See: ACBL Convention Charts
2NT asking for aces, undefined hand type.
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
If 2NT is not legal, is 4NT opening asking for aces legal, and why the difference?
See: ACBL Convention Charts
2NT asking for aces, undefined hand type.
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
If 2NT is not legal, is 4NT opening asking for aces legal, and why the difference?
It's legal if it's "strength showing" (Opening bids - 4). Now the 5 page debate about what that term means and how dumb the ACBL is for not defining it and all the various different inconsistent rulings people have gotten on that point.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#3
Posted 2009-November-28, 22:54
2NT asking specific Aces seems much better. Maybe 'right' Ace(s) promotes to moose.
If general number Aces, just show big hand. Why ask?
If general number Aces, just show big hand. Why ask?
#4
Posted 2009-November-28, 23:39
glen, on Nov 28 2009, 08:41 PM, said:
2NT asking for aces, undefined hand type.
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
2N-3♣-P
I was just curious if partner had all the aces, director. We might miss 3N after all.
#5
Posted 2009-November-28, 23:40
Rob F, on Nov 28 2009, 10:39 PM, said:
glen, on Nov 28 2009, 08:41 PM, said:
2NT asking for aces, undefined hand type.
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
(btw responses are 3♣ 0-3 aces, 3♦ 4 aces)
2N-3♣-P
I was just curious if partner had all the aces, director.
Nope, he just had AKQ AKQxxxx AKQ void.
Page 1 of 1