What does this mean in your system? Just for fun
#1
Posted 2009-November-14, 15:46
In ours, it means invitational values with 44 in the majors and at least 3 clubs. Opener has shown 11-13 balanced without a four card major.
#2
Posted 2009-November-14, 16:28
1H(Unbalanced hand)- 1S artifical game force
1NT(probably 3-4-1-5 because 4-4-1-4 would have opened differently)-2C sets trumps, but not as huge as 1C-2D to start with, or not as many clubs as 1C-2D, then club support.
#3
Posted 2009-November-14, 16:34
With one partner (Nat, 5 card M):
1♣ "SemiNAT", 11-23, 2+♣
1♦ 4+♦, 6+ points, no Walsh
1♥ 2+♣, 4(+)♥, 11-18
1♠ fourth suit forcing (not my choice, but you need two to play bridge)
1NT 12-14 BAL, 3=4=3=3, 3=4=2=4 or 2=4=3=4
2♣ Natural and forcing to at least 2 of responder's first suit: (that means 2♦
I don't think it makes much sense, but that's what it means.
With the other (in a strong club context)
1♣ ART, 17+
1♦ ART, 0-7
1♥ any 23+ or 21-22 BAL or 17-22 with 5+♥
1♠ relay, denying various hands, such as 5-7 with 3♥ or 0-3 single suiters
1NT 17-20, exactly 5♥ + 4♠ or 4(+)♣ (NF)
2♣ to play opposite 5♥+4(+)♣
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#4
Posted 2009-November-14, 16:34
Playing up the line, I think it's to play.
With Shogi (Playing T-Walsh), it's a 2nd relay (1♠ was the first relay)
With Manudude03, playing T-Walsh, I think it must be to play. 1♠ was natural and NF.
With gwnn, playing strong club, 2♣ is to play. 1♥ was Kokish and 1♠ 2nd negative I think.
#5
Posted 2009-November-14, 16:38
1♦ = game force, denies any 5440
1♥ = non minimum strong club opener, prefers to ask rather than show
1♠ = Two suited with Hearts OR Single Suited with a red suit
1N = Relay
2♣ = Single suited with Diamonds OR 2 suited with ♦ + ♥
#6
Posted 2009-November-14, 16:54
#7
Posted 2009-November-14, 23:56
1♣ - clubs or balanced 15-19
1♦ - 4+ hearts, can be very weak
1♥ - balanced 15-bad 17 or unbalanced with 3 hearts
1♠ - asks, can still be weak
1NT - balanced 15-17
2♣ - invitational checkback, responder has finally shown some values, but not enough to force to game; opener bids 2♦ with either 2 hearts or a minimum, 2♥ with most hands with 3 hearts, 2♠ with a good hand with 43 in the Majors, 3♥ with a really good hand with 3 hearts.
#8
Posted 2009-November-15, 00:52
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#9
Posted 2009-November-15, 00:55
Bende, on Nov 14 2009, 04:46 PM, said:
In ours, it means invitational values with 44 in the majors and at least 3 clubs. Opener has shown 11-13 balanced without a four card major.
Walsh style:
1s=art, game force. Responder has real diamonds. Maybe...AK....x.....AKxxx....Qxxxx
2c=agree clubs.
opener has 4h and an unbalanced hand maybe:
QJx...AKxx...x.....Jxxxx
#10
Posted 2009-November-15, 01:55
1♣ - art. forcing, when white any 16+, when red 16+ unbal or 18+ bal
1♦ - art. negative, any shape, usually 0-7 but any hand with fewer than 2 controls (A=2, K=1) bids this.
1♥ - kokish puppet, either hearts or a non-minimum balanced hand
1♠ - art. and forced.
1nt - balanced hand, if we were white this is 19-21. If we were red this is 20-21.
2♣ - puppet to 2♦, keri, could be to play, usually would be some sort of game invite or game force about to reveal itself in one more round.
We don't know much at all about shapes, just opener has at least 2 in every suit. could have a 5 card major or 6 card minor. But really, most likely, this is just a 6 bid sequence (7 if you count the 2♦ that is coming) that gets us to the point of a standard player opening 2nt with responder having had a couple of extra choices because of the extra space.
#11
Posted 2009-November-15, 03:36
1♦ transfer ♥
1♥- 3c♥ forcing
1♠ 4c♥, 4c♠ forcing
1NT- 12-14; 4/5c♣;3c♥, No 4c♠;
2♣ To play; weak 4144
(This is different if 1♣ is opened in 3rd hand. No T-Walsh then)
#12
Posted 2009-November-15, 07:47
1♣ 4+ ♣ (not 12-14 bal)
1♦ natural (5)6+ probably denies 5♦ and 4♣ and 10+ (forcing)
1♥ shows 5+♣ and 4♥ (forcing) (all balanced 15-18 would now bid 1NT with a checkback of sorts) denies a 4414 15-18
1♠ naturalish suggesting misfit but not really suited for NT from that side (forcing) so could be a complete lie just wanting to hear what comes next
1NT minimum, hand not suited to open an offshape weak NT (points in short suits), denies a 4405, denies a 0445, denies a 4414 with a stiff king or A
2♣ to play, probably 4153, could easily be 4252 and not suited to NT
I know it is ancient stuff, but saw nothing else here similar
Sean
#13
Posted 2009-November-15, 10:11
1♣ 2 plus cards practically forcing, 1♦ relay ( can be very weak), 1♥ relay ( now the weak 0-5 pts responses with 5 plus hearts pass), 1♠ relay (not hands with 44 majors,6 to 10 pts, they respond 1 nt here, 1nt now finally by opener shows a 12 -14 nt. After that 2♣ is a game forcing relay looking for a 4-4 fit and now 4-crd suits are being bid from the bottom up. (2nt is 3334 and 3♣promisses 5 ♣
I also try this with pick up partners on bbo.
#14
Posted 2009-November-15, 10:14
With Helene when we play strong club 2♣ is stayman of course since opener has just promised 18+ and now responder has game interest opp 19-21.
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2009-November-15, 10:45
gwnn, on Nov 15 2009, 05:14 PM, said:
Yes of course, good that u put that straight.
#16
Posted 2009-November-15, 11:00
1♣ - 1♦ (nat 3+♣ ; Walsh)
1♥ - 1♠ (forces 1♠ various hands ; obligated)
1NT - 2♣ (18-19HCP balanced ; 2-way checkback)
#17
Posted 2009-November-15, 13:10
on Viking club
1♣-1♦ strong - negative
1♥-1♠ very strong - double negative
1NT-2♣ balanced - weak stayman
#18
Posted 2009-November-15, 14:14
1♣ 1♦
1♥ 1♠
1NT 2♣
2♦ 2♥
2♠ 2NT
3♣
(This actually has more to do with my weird ideas about garbage stayman followups than it does with anything pertaining to the strong club.) And then I don't think a 3♦ bid exists. Can someone go farther? I wouldn't be surprised.
#19
Posted 2009-November-15, 14:59
#20
Posted 2009-November-15, 15:02
So many versions of strong club, short club, standard, and 2/1 were given as requested, and not one person criticized anyone else's choice...is this a record?

Help
