Anything Special? Is there any way to show this?
#1
Posted 2009-June-18, 16:04
x
AKTx
AK9x
AJTx
You deal:
1♦ - (1♠) - X - (3♠*)
??
*Weak
How do you show this, or do you just accept it, and bid 4♥?
Sorry if this is wtp.
#3
Posted 2009-June-18, 16:22
#4
Posted 2009-June-18, 16:52
#5
Posted 2009-June-18, 16:54
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#6
Posted 2009-June-19, 00:24
So I bid 4♠.
But what to do after the possible rebids from partner?
Is 5 ♥ enough after his possible 5 ♣ call?
What shall we do after the expected 5♥ bid? I think we must pass but what shall partner do with at most one KC? There are not many hands which allow him to cooperate with no red first and second round control.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2009-June-19, 04:07
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#9
Posted 2009-June-19, 08:41
Hanoi5, on Jun 19 2009, 11:07 AM, said:
It depends what 4♠ means. If it promises heart support (as maybe it should), then 5♣ or 5♦ would be a cue bid. If 4♠ might also be a slam try with diamonds, or with both minors, then partner's 5♣ or 5♦ is just an attempt to play there.
#10
Posted 2009-June-19, 08:43
Little Kid, on Jun 19 2009, 03:32 PM, said:
Takeout, but not with four hearts - 1354, 2353, 2344, etc. I'd be quite worried about partner passing it.
#11
Posted 2009-June-19, 08:44
Little Kid, on Jun 19 2009, 03:32 PM, said:
Double is significant extras and asks p to bid 3NT with a spade stopper. It will often include 3-card heart support but I don't think it's a good idea to double with 4-card support. Partner will often pass the double when it's wrong.
#12
Posted 2009-June-19, 10:44
gnasher, on Jun 19 2009, 09:41 AM, said:
Presumably, you would then have to bid 5H after partner's attempt to play at the five-level in a minor to confirm that you really had 4 hearts. This seems fine if you are willing to play slam in a minor suit if the original negative double did not include four hearts (XXX XX QXX KQXXX). Maybe not so fine if XXX XXX QXX KQXX.
I really dislike having to pass originally with those hands, but if the neg double guaranteed hearts and partner couldn't take a joke if i bid 1NT, no choice.
#13
Posted 2009-June-19, 12:52
aguahombre, on Jun 19 2009, 05:44 PM, said:
I really dislike having to pass originally with those hands, but if the neg double guaranteed hearts and partner couldn't take a joke if i bid 1NT, no choice.
This may not be mainstream, but I'd raise to 2♦ on either of those hands. Partner's about 100 times more likely to have five diamonds than three.
Anyway, you certainly can't double on either. Negative doubles without the unbid major might be OK if you're strong enough to control the auction, but a balanced seven count doesn't qualify.
#14
Posted 2009-June-19, 12:57
gnasher, on Jun 19 2009, 01:52 PM, said:
aguahombre, on Jun 19 2009, 05:44 PM, said:
I really dislike having to pass originally with those hands, but if the neg double guaranteed hearts and partner couldn't take a joke if i bid 1NT, no choice.
This may not be mainstream, but I'd raise to 2♦ on either of those hands. Partner's about 100 times more likely to have five diamonds than three.
Anyway, you certainly can't double on either. Negative doubles without the unbid major might be OK if you're strong enough to control the auction, but a balanced seven count doesn't qualify.
I would pass on both, my major qualm with raising diamonds on 3+ is that partner holding any amount of diamonds 4+ may overcompete later in the auction. But it's certainly evident you can't double with those.

Help
