You and pard conduct the following auction:
1♦ (must be an unbalanced hand), 1♥ (4+ hearts); 1♠ (4 spades), 2♣ (XYZ, forces 2♦; 2♦ (forced), 2NT (denies 5 hearts, the only way to bid 2NT nonforcing); 3♦ (6+ diamonds, nonforcing), 3♠.
So far, you've shown a minimum hand with 6+ diamonds and 4 spades; pard has shown a balanced invite with something in spades. The question is, is partner trying to play in a 4-3 fit for a superior matchpoint partscore or does he have a hand that's been improved by your extra diamond length and is now looking for the best game, maybe something like KQx QTxx xx Axx or even Kx Axxx xxx Axxx?
Page 1 of 1
Is 3S forcing? Complex constructive auction
#2
Posted 2009-May-10, 11:06
I don't think that either of these two hands has been improved by your extra diamond length. I think that partner is exactly 3415. And of course it is non-forcing, partner has shown an invite and we have shown a minimum (and a minimum 4-6 can be lighter than a minimum balanced hand).
By the way, it doesn't seem right to play that 2NT denies 5 hearts. First of all, if partner has 3 hearts we will usually hear about it over 2NT (perhaps partner passes with a minimum 4342). Secondly, I would hate to invite in hearts holding something like AJx J10xxx x KQxx, this is a 2NT bid imo.
By the way, it doesn't seem right to play that 2NT denies 5 hearts. First of all, if partner has 3 hearts we will usually hear about it over 2NT (perhaps partner passes with a minimum 4342). Secondly, I would hate to invite in hearts holding something like AJx J10xxx x KQxx, this is a 2NT bid imo.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
Page 1 of 1

Help
