BBO Discussion Forums: Is 3S forcing? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Is 3S forcing? Complex constructive auction

Poll: Is 3S forcing? (13 member(s) have cast votes)

Is 3S forcing?

  1. Yes (4 votes [30.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.77%

  2. No (9 votes [69.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 69.23%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fasteddy 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 22
  • Joined: 2005-January-24

Posted 2009-May-10, 10:53

You and pard conduct the following auction:

1 (must be an unbalanced hand), 1 (4+ hearts); 1 (4 spades), 2 (XYZ, forces 2; 2 (forced), 2NT (denies 5 hearts, the only way to bid 2NT nonforcing); 3 (6+ diamonds, nonforcing), 3.

So far, you've shown a minimum hand with 6+ diamonds and 4 spades; pard has shown a balanced invite with something in spades. The question is, is partner trying to play in a 4-3 fit for a superior matchpoint partscore or does he have a hand that's been improved by your extra diamond length and is now looking for the best game, maybe something like KQx QTxx xx Axx or even Kx Axxx xxx Axxx?
0

#2 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2009-May-10, 11:06

I don't think that either of these two hands has been improved by your extra diamond length. I think that partner is exactly 3415. And of course it is non-forcing, partner has shown an invite and we have shown a minimum (and a minimum 4-6 can be lighter than a minimum balanced hand).

By the way, it doesn't seem right to play that 2NT denies 5 hearts. First of all, if partner has 3 hearts we will usually hear about it over 2NT (perhaps partner passes with a minimum 4342). Secondly, I would hate to invite in hearts holding something like AJx J10xxx x KQxx, this is a 2NT bid imo.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users