BBO Discussion Forums: Random partner at an individual - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Random partner at an individual Online tournament

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2009-January-19, 11:30

Non-Vul against Vul opponents you open the following hand with 1:

QJx
AKxxx
Axx
AT

Your partner, an intermidiate player according to himself, bids 4. Opponents are passing, do you:

(1)Pass
(2)Bid on

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2009-January-19, 11:37

why do people even bother asking questions about random partners? you know nothing about them, they know nothing about you. they might be totally competent players who intentionally misbid here fearing that without agreements you might pass a forcing raise in hearts... or they might be total idiots who bid 4H with a very biddable slam.

my inclination with bbo randoms is always the second and i would bid on, though. more often than not you're sitting across from either a n00b or an idiot who has no idea what they're doing.
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2009-January-19, 11:47

I believe pass is the correct bid so that's what I gonna do.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   Benoit35 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 134
  • Joined: 2008-November-10

Posted 2009-January-19, 11:48

Probably less scary than if partner advertised himself as "Expert"... but the lines of communication a severely hurt.

If partner's profile says "SAYC", I would assume he has his 5-card heart support, Blackwood and shoot for the slam if he has the ace of spades. I assume you don't play money tournaments with unknown partners.

Lemme guess. He had 11 hcp, a 4-3-3-3, and no Q? :o
Ils finiront par aimer ça un jour.
- Ludwig van Beethoven
0

#5 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-January-19, 12:11

Impossible problem but I Pass and go plus. Same strategy as if you walked into a 5 cent rubber game in a strange city.

Pard could be an idiot or be playing YOU to be an idiot. Form of scoring? If Pard looks at your profile they see???

If they see expert, maybe they feel lucky with a 10 count and at most scoring forms I make Pass a 2-1 favorite to survive.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#6 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-19, 12:23

I pass. In most Indys, everyone else is an idiot. This means partner could have x xxxxxx xxx xxx or AKxx Qxxx Kxx xx. Bidding on may be right, but since I want to cut my losses, I will pass. Everyone else will be in 4 also, unless you have 42 HCP between the two hands.
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#7 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-January-19, 12:41

Not sure

say there's 60% of hands that make slam of all possible indy raises (weighted by probability). out of these hands 85% are not 4 bids.

If I pass will it make me proud that I respected the Principles, the System, Common Sense?

Not sure about the 60%. I think I'd try for slam in an indy on BBO though, that's what my feeling tells me.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#8 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2009-January-19, 13:12

With this partner I would rather bid 7 than pass.

Do we have slam continuations set?

If not I'll just bid 6 and hope he doesn't raise me.
Kevin Fay
0

#9 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2009-January-19, 13:15

Benoit35, on Jan 19 2009, 12:48 PM, said:

Probably less scary than if partner advertised himself as "Expert"...

Then we would know that 4 was a ridiculous and bad bid :D ;)
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#10 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2009-January-19, 13:18

I am sure I have made this comment before.

On BBO, it is absolutely amazing how many players, playing a standard system, raise one of a major to four of a major with game forcing hands.

So, there is no way of knowing whether partner has a preemptive 4 call or a game forcing 4 call. I pass and hope that (a) he has a preemptive 4 call or (b ) slam doesn't make.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users