Strategy with 4-4-4-1 Acol theory
#1
Posted 2008-December-25, 03:58
♠KJ76 ♥AT43 ♦KQ72 ♣2 ?
1♦ - 2♣ - 2NT is 15-17 forcing.
Perhaps you play 5-cd majors. Then what?
Nick
#2
Posted 2008-December-25, 04:29
shevek, on Dec 25 2008, 09:58 AM, said:
Does this site really exist? yuck!
#3
Posted 2008-December-25, 04:36
#4
Posted 2008-December-25, 05:10
cherdano, on Dec 25 2008, 11:36 AM, said:
Yes, that's the main reason for playing 12-14 and 4-card majors. It means that 1M is always either unbalanced or a good hand.
Acol is no better at handling this shape than any other system. 1x-2y; 2NT shows 15+, so that's out. The choices are:
- Open 1H and rebid 2D over 2C, implying five hearts.
- Open 1D and rebid 2D over 2C
- Open 1NT
Most people open 1♥ and rebid 2♦.
#5
Posted 2008-December-25, 05:18
If you play weak NT with 5cM and don't like to open this hand 1NT, you need a special agreement. I think Frances open 1♦ and rebids 2♥ over 2♣, which doesn't promise extras as it would in most natural systems.
#6
Posted 2008-December-25, 08:03
shevek, on Dec 25 2008, 12:58 PM, said:
♠KJ76 ♥AT43 ♦KQ72 ♣2 ?
1♦ - 2♣ - 2NT is 15-17 forcing.
Perhaps you play 5-cd majors. Then what?
Nick
Doesn't this depend on partnership agreement?
My impression is that one traditionally opened the suit over the singleton playing Acol. (This might have changed)
#7
Posted 2008-December-25, 08:48
shevek, on Dec 25 2008, 04:58 AM, said:
♠KJ76_♥AT43_♦KQ72_♣2
1♦-2♣;2N is 15-17 forcing.
Perhaps you play 5-cd majors. Then what?
Nick
IIRC, Eric Rodwell once wrote an article where he suggested a radical way to handle minimum opening strength 4441's in 1st or 2nd.
Pass.
If one can't bring ones self to adopt that approach, then your partnership has to figure out how they will handle this issue.
I've seen just about every imaginable way of dealing with this issue. I have not seen a way that experts overwhelming liked over the others.
So, pick one
a= pass
b= open 1D and raise 1M or pass 1N (my favorite with this strength =4441)
c= open a major and rebid 2D or pass 1N
d= do something like what Frances does
e= play a 3 suited opening
At least this hand type is easier to deal with than minimum opening strength =1444's.
#8
Posted 2008-December-25, 09:17
By the way this hand is MUCH higher trick expectancy than a common 16hcp hand. (simmers try this out) So I ask passers how in the world will you 'catch up' a game force plus when partner shows light or better opener? Can't hope that works well.
#9
Posted 2008-December-25, 11:45
dake50, on Dec 25 2008, 10:17 AM, said:
13 HCP 4441's have a higher trick taking expectancy than the average 16 HCP hand?
If that's true, I must be misremembering Eric Rodwell's article. He's got a decent reputation as a theorist after all.
Yet another reference to try and find. Anyone out there know the Rodwell article where he makes comments on minimum strength 4441's, please post a cite?
#10
Posted 2008-December-25, 15:26
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#11
Posted 2008-December-25, 15:31
since otherwise you are dead after
a 2C response, of course 1NT is
reasonable as well.
If playing 5 card major with a weak NT,
... I will open 1NT.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#12
Posted 2008-December-25, 15:39
Playing 5 card majors you open 1♦, and if partner bids 2♣ then one of 2♦, 2M, or 2NT should be allowed with this shape. I find the suggestions to start with pass or 1NT both extremely silly.
#13
Posted 2008-December-25, 16:03
#14
Posted 2008-December-25, 16:10
jdonn, on Dec 25 2008, 04:39 PM, said:
Playing 5 card majors you open 1♦, and if partner bids 2♣ then one of 2♦, 2M, or 2NT should be allowed with this shape. I find the suggestions to start with pass or 1NT both extremely silly.
If you play 5 card majors and a weak NT,
than at least I would assume, that the 2NT
rebid showes the strong NT, hence rebidding
2NT is not an option.
And if you allow the 2NTrebid, which also showes
a bal. shape, than allowing to open 1NT is not hugely
different.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
Posted 2008-December-25, 16:24
hrothgar, on Dec 25 2008, 03:03 PM, said:
No, the suit under the stiff, and 1♥ with this hand. Modern standard is 1♦ with 1444 but otherwise unchanged.
Josh finds 1nt extremely silly but the standard 1♥ opening leads to a rebid problem over 2♣. The only option is then 2♦ which otherwise would have been a 5card hearts and p very often takes preference with a doubleton hearts.
#16
Posted 2008-December-26, 07:59
#17
Posted 2008-December-26, 08:36
Pass."
Can you cite the source of this please?
I would open 1H.
"Playing Acol you can open 1♦ and rebid 2♦." Really? Can you? News to me!
#18
Posted 2008-December-26, 08:44
Opening 1Nt ,showing 5H or passing are terrible ways to play bridge.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."

Help
