Do you sit, or do you take action? Do you disagree with X in the first place at this vulnerability?
Page 1 of 1
Redoblo
#1
Posted 2008-December-23, 00:21
Do you sit, or do you take action? Do you disagree with X in the first place at this vulnerability?
Chris Gibson
#2
Posted 2008-December-23, 00:27
If double is takeout of diamonds (as it is for me), this is a WTP Pass.
Partner's pass of the redouble is to play.
Partner's pass of the redouble is to play.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#3
Posted 2008-December-23, 00:29
655321, on Dec 22 2008, 11:27 PM, said:
If double is takeout of diamonds (as it is for me), this is a WTP Pass.
Partner's pass of the redouble is to play.
Partner's pass of the redouble is to play.
Your X is open for interpretation; this is a casual partnership, and the auction has not been discussed.
Chris Gibson
#4
Posted 2008-December-23, 01:48
That is a weird meaning of redouble.
I would pass and hope that partner knows this double is takeout. What else can you do? If we can't beat 3N, 4M will be a disaster, too.
(I guess I need a doubt-showing reredouble.)
I would pass and hope that partner knows this double is takeout. What else can you do? If we can't beat 3N, 4M will be a disaster, too.
(I guess I need a doubt-showing reredouble.)
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#5
Posted 2008-December-23, 01:54
How can a preempter not have doubt?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#6
Posted 2008-December-23, 01:59
jdonn, on Dec 23 2008, 01:54 AM, said:
How can a preempter not have doubt?
Against what is likely a takeout double?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
Page 1 of 1

Help

(3♦)-P-(3N)-X,
(XX)*-P-(P)-?
*implies doubt