lead
#1
Posted 2007-June-29, 11:44
♠9853
♥---
♦AQ4
♣KQ6543
1♣-(2♣)-p-(4♥)
5♣-(5♥)-all pass
#3
Posted 2007-June-29, 11:49
♦A looks too desperate, and the ♣K could be a disaster if declarer has AJTx (x). Hoping pard has a slow spade or a slow heart trick and can push a diamond through.
#4
Posted 2007-June-29, 11:56
The ♦A may well be described as a desperate lead, but I've already announced that I'm in desperation mode by my 5♣ call.
I'm going to try to cash my ♦ winners, 'cos I don't expect to have any ♣ winners and there is no rush to try to take ♠s... not that I expect partner to have a ♠ entry.
BTW, I truly do not understand the 5♣ call, even at favourable at mps. I hate partners who try to win every board all by themselves, and that's what 5♣ sounds like to me.
#5
Posted 2007-June-29, 11:58
#7
Posted 2007-June-29, 13:05
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#8
Posted 2007-June-29, 13:52
As I can't imagine that Apollo or his partner would bid 5C I suspect that this was an appeal's case where partner made a slow pass of 5H.
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2007-June-29, 13:56
How many diamond pitches will declarer will get off dummy's spades? I'm guessing two or 3 assuming the suit gets set up. This also assumes that pard does not have a spade entry.
The tap seems pointless to me - the opponents have announced 9 hearts. Its true they may be on a 5-3, but in my experience they have a minimum of 9 trump and probably 10.
#10
Posted 2007-June-29, 14:03
Hannie, on Jun 29 2007, 03:52 PM, said:
As I can't imagine that Apollo or his partner would bid 5C I suspect that this was an appeal's case where partner made a slow pass of 5H.
Oh no, it was me. This was one of my favorable matchpoint specials that I can only defend by saying that it would have been a great score if I had gotten doubled or found the right lead (which I would also have to do against 4♥ not to get a crap score obviously).
You can get a way with a LOT at favorable at MPs, especially if you know your opps' tendencies. For instance as long as partner is prepared for this sort of bidding I would routinely open a weak two on xx KJ97x xxxx xx 1st seat favorable.
#12 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-June-29, 15:27
#14
Posted 2007-June-29, 17:00
Club King stands out, but I mean by that "stands out as a ridiculous alternative."
How about a spade? It is plausible that partner has a void there, but that seems like quite the stretch. Plus, it is not creative enough.
Low diamond? Anything possible there? Well, what if I catch partner with Kx, dummy with 5530, and Declarer with the club Ace. I like that -- tricky and all. Of course, that gives Declarer five diamonds, but why not?
So, if I want to win the "guess the secret lead that works" game, I'll try a low diamond. It has merit, and it actually makes some sense. I doubt that a club lead will be the October Surprise, so I may well need partner to have the diamond King anyway. No one else voted small diamond, and I like to be different.
Heck -- put me down for small diamond!
-P.J. Painter.
#15
Posted 2007-June-29, 17:09
DA for me as well. That 5C bid is hanging from the trees by the way.
#16
Posted 2007-June-29, 17:19
The_Hog, on Jun 29 2007, 06:09 PM, said:
DA for me as well. That 5C bid is hanging from the tress by the way.
I just got off the golf course, 18 holes, wine coolers.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2007-June-29, 22:24
5♥ can be made on the ♣K too, but it requires declarer to guess ♣Jx with pard, which is doable since when he leads the ♣10 from hand you're going to duck with ♣Q6543. This declarer was a GLM and may well have been up to the task, but I guess I'll never know.
-650 = 2/23
-620 = 11/23
-500 = 17/23
+100 = 22.5/23

Help
