Style question, 3rd seat white vs red
#1
Posted 2007-April-01, 14:30
(If you use a mixed strategy, please indicate your most likely opening in an important team match.)
#4
Posted 2007-April-01, 14:44
#6
Posted 2007-April-01, 18:51
#7
Posted 2007-April-01, 18:58
#8
Posted 2007-April-02, 07:07
Winstonm, on Apr 2 2007, 12:58 AM, said:
Very commendable.
How do you do it? The qualification stages of any event in the world always involve at least some weak teams or weak fields.
Being able to beat up bunnies is not only a worthwhile skill, it's important even in events such as the Olympiad.
#9
Posted 2007-April-02, 07:14
#10
Posted 2007-April-02, 07:44
#11
Posted 2007-April-02, 08:50
2♦
#12
Posted 2007-April-02, 09:08
Pass
Harald
#13
Posted 2007-April-02, 09:50
If 2N for the minors were available, I'd try that, because I think the jamming I accomplish outweighs the information I pass along.
#15
Posted 2007-April-02, 14:16
Still as people have pointed out it's the best action against bad players since they tend do to stupider things in competitive auctions than they would otherwise.
#16
Posted 2007-April-02, 15:46
Apollo81, on Apr 2 2007, 03:16 PM, said:
Still as people have pointed out it's the best action against bad players since they tend do to stupider things in competitive auctions than they would otherwise.
Good players also do stupider things in competitive auctions, but fewer stupid things, and they are more likely to take advantage of your 1D bid. But let's not pretend that good players bid as well in competitive auctions as they do in constructive auctions.
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2007-April-02, 15:53
I personally would not open 1♦, for the reason that weak penings in third seat, especially if not particularly preemptive, tend to overstate lead-direction interests. If I did open this hand, I'd open 2♦ because weak twos in third seat are often deemed cruddy and much less reliable as a lead-direction.
Heck, on this one, I might even open 3♦, given the right table feel and needs of the event.
-P.J. Painter.
#18
Posted 2007-April-02, 16:40
In my experience, the unassuming 2D preempt can create a lot of problems for opps, even good ones.
Peter
#20
Posted 2007-April-02, 17:34
Hannie, on Apr 2 2007, 04:46 PM, said:
Apollo81, on Apr 2 2007, 03:16 PM, said:
Still as people have pointed out it's the best action against bad players since they tend do to stupider things in competitive auctions than they would otherwise.
Good players also do stupider things in competitive auctions, but fewer stupid things, and they are more likely to take advantage of your 1D bid. But let's not pretend that good players bid as well in competitive auctions as they do in constructive auctions.
The problem to me is you may have just turned a passout into a competitive auction by opening, as a number of hands can overcall that won't open (or double for takeout, or RHO can come back in as passed hand). And when I hold the minors the passout is just fine with me. Combine with the difficulty in partner ever bidding normally if you open on the 1 level on these hands, and the bad chances a preempt will end in some silly 5-1 fit, and my position that pass is clear (except vs players who you think can't handle a bid) remains unchanged.

Help
