BBO Discussion Forums: pick a partscore - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

pick a partscore MPs

#1 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:34

10
109642
AKJ74
104

unfavorable, MPs

1-(1)-Dbl-(pass)
1NT-(pass)-???

2 would be NF, not new minor forcing.
0

#2 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:50

2 looks normal to me. 5-5's want to play in a suit.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#3 User is offline   scoob 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:calgary, ab (canada)

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:55

edit: sorry, not reading fully before posting lol

3nt
0

#4 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,696
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2007-March-26, 12:55

I like a pass of 1NT. Partner has something in spades wasted opposite my singleton, and probably has something in clubs (the suit he opened). The 10 may help if the opponents lead spades. The diamonds here are very good and if partner has some diamond holding like xxx or Qx they are a great source of tricks.

It seems unlikely to me that we "belong" in hearts, since partner could've bid 2 with three hearts and weakish spades, and my heart suit is not strong enough to make a 5-2 desirable. There is also no guarantee that partner has a true balanced hand in this auction; I would bid 1NT with various 4-2-2-5 and even 4-1-3-5 patterns.

With more scattered values (say x KTxxx KQxxx xx) I would tend to bid 2, but with one suit that can run opposite small cards and another than lacks any high honor, I prefer the 1NT contract.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:21

I know this is another thread and it's not the same deal as the last neg. x one, but

-does p promise a stop?
-can p rebid 2 on 3 cards?
-what did the original X show? reds or only 4+ hearts?

etc.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:23

gwnn, on Mar 26 2007, 03:21 PM, said:

I know this is another thread and it's not the same deal as the last neg. x one, but

-does p promise a stop?
-can p rebid 2 on 3 cards?
-what did the original X show? reds or only 4+ hearts?

etc.

standard

(in case this is confusing, this means ....
stop -- judgment
2 on 3 --- judgment
the X --- 4+ hearts, a normal negative double)
0

#7 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-March-26, 13:25

I'd bid 2H, I assume someone will bid 2S since they have 8 of them and some HCP and then I'll bid 3D
0

#8 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-March-26, 15:37

That's a good plan, though you can try and muddy the waters with 2. If opps bid 2 and pard passes, you can try 2NT and totally confuse pard :)
0

#9 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-26, 15:51

This is a repost from the Washington Bridge League

http://www.districts...07/Sol0701.aspx
0

#10 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2007-March-27, 08:57

I would have 2Ded, but I like 2H better now, at MPs.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#11 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2007-March-27, 13:28

IMO 1NT is probably the best partscore but a pass will leave us poorly placed if LHO bids 2. If we bid 2 now we can certainly bid 3 over 2, but 2 may be a very poor contract if partner has fewer than three. I am pretty sure that I would bid 2 at the table; we can still get the 5-5 picture across by bidding 2NT over an opponent's 2 bid. This will also never be a 5-1, and partner may take a preference with 3-2 in the red suits.
0

#12 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2007-March-27, 13:48

Apollo81, on Mar 27 2007, 02:28 PM, said:

and partner may take a preference with 3-2 in the red suits.

good luck :) 4-6 is much more likely so he will pass.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users